Click to login and read the full article.
Don’t have access? Click here to request a demo
Alternatively, Call a member of the team to discuss membership options
US and Overseas: +1 646-931-9045
UK: 0207 139 1600
Abstract
We start from the provocative contention that if an investor did not rebalance earlier this year (2020), then that investor does not have an asset allocation policy. More specifically, that investor does not have a rebalancing policy to preserve their asset allocation. We then work backward from a presumption that a correction needs to induce a rebalancing trade and develop an algebraic solution for the width of the rebalancing range to ensure it does so. Across a range of reasonable assumptions, rebalancing ranges need to be tighter than traditional norms.
TOPICS: Statistical methods, portfolio construction, risk management
Key Findings
• Wealth managers promising benefits from rebalancing need to deliver on that promise.
• Corrections and bear markets, surprisingly, do not trigger traditional rebalancing ranges.
• We develop a nontrivial analytical expression for rebalancing ranges that will trigger in a stock market correction and find they encourage much tighter rebalancing ranges.
- © 2020 Pageant Media Ltd
Don’t have access? Click here to request a demo
Alternatively, Call a member of the team to discuss membership options
US and Overseas: +1 646-931-9045
UK: 0207 139 1600