RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Analyst Ratings and MOAT Ratings Sensitivities to ESG Risk and Fund Charges
JF The Journal of Wealth Management
FD Institutional Investor Journals
SP 55
OP 70
DO 10.3905/jwm.2022.1.176
VO 25
IS 2
A1 C. Edward Chang
A1 Thomas M. Krueger
A1 H. Doug Witte
YR 2022
UL https://pm-research.com/content/25/2/55.abstract
AB Investment risk has many dimensions beyond the macroeconomic, industry, and firm gradients. This article reports on a study of investor response to various levels of corporate exposure to environmental, societal, and governance risk, which is frequently referred to as sustainability. The article also studies the correlation between sustainability and economic moats. Investor response is measured using Morningstar’s Analyst ratings and Quantitative ratings. The extent to which loads and annual expenses impact analyst and MOAT ratings is also explored. We document the surprising negative relationship between mutual fund sustainability and Morningstar’s Analyst ratings and Quantitative ratings. By comparison, there is an anticipated positive relationship between fund Sustainability ratings and Morningstar Economic Moat ratings (MOAT ratings). Although Analyst ratings are swayed by loads and expense ratios, MOAT ratings are insensitive. Fortunately, paying loads and higher expense ratios does not result in higher MOAT ratings.